Why are so many promising mangas canceled after just a few chapters? Shinsuke Kondouauthor of Ninja to Gokudouhas just given an answer that few mangakas dare to say in public: many times the problem is not the story or the talent of the author, it is the editorial interference that distances the work from what made it special in the first place.
The question that every manga reader has ever asked themselves
In Japan it is not uncommon to see series canceled after just a few episodes, without enough time to develop their story or connect with the public. It's a pattern that readers constantly notice and that always raises the same question: what really happened behind the scenes?
According to Shinsuke Kondō, author of Ninja to Gokudōmuch of the answer has to do with something that the industry rarely discusses openly: the direct influence of editors on creative decisions, often based on what they consider “most salable,” and not necessarily on what the work needs.
“Any editor who tells you that if you do exactly what they tell you, you will sell, is a scammer.”
The conversation started when Kondou He shared on social networks a phrase that his former editor left him, warning him about blind trust in guaranteed formulas for success within the publishing industry.
According to the author himself, that warning sums up a large part of the problem: there are publishers who present their suggestions as guarantees of commercial success, when in reality no one can predict with certainty what will work with the public. Kondou was clear in pointing out that these types of promises should set off alarm bells in any manga artist who hears them.
When the error that readers criticize is not the author's
One of the most revealing points of the entire conversation is something that will probably surprise a good part of the fandom: in several cases that Kondō knows firsthand, the elements of a work that readers publicly criticize – plots, character decisions, narrative twists – were not born from the mangaka himself, but from editorial suggestions designed specifically to increase the commercial appeal of the series.
That is, the author ends up shouldering public criticism of decisions that, in many cases, were not even completely his.
Following editorial advice does not guarantee success
Kondō also mentioned cases of other manga artists who received various suggestions from their editors to make their stories more popular. What is striking is that, even when these authors followed the recommendations to the letter, several of these works ended up criticized by readers and did not achieve the success they were looking for — which in some cases led directly to their cancellation.
This calls into question one of the most repeated premises within the Japanese publishing industry: that publishers, based on their experience, always know what will work commercially.
The weight of an editor with great successes behind
Another important nuance that Kondō pointed out is that some of these editors were already involved in previous major commercial successes, which gives them additional weight within the industry. When an editor with that track record suggests a change, it's much harder for a mangaka—especially a young one or one without successes of his own yet—to question or reject that suggestion, even if his creative instinct tells him otherwise.
This power dynamic, as can be seen from the author's statements, is a structural part of the problem.
A surprisingly balanced stance
Despite all of the above, Kondō did not point out the editors as villains of the process. The author himself stated that, in his experience, he never considered that the editors were completely “wrong” in their suggestions — the final responsibility, according to him, ends up being shared or depends deeply on the particular context of each work.
His final conclusion was just as nuanced: the outcome of a manga depends as much on the skill of the author as it does on a real component of luck in the editorial decisions made along the way. There is no guaranteed formula, neither on the talent side nor on the editorial side.
Why this conversation matters to any manga reader
The statements of Kondou They touch a nerve that goes far beyond their own work. Whenever a fandom wonders why a manga it loved abruptly changed direction, or why a promising series was canceled for no apparent reason, the answer probably involves decisions made in editorial meetings that the public never gets to see.
For readers, this changes the way they read criticism of an author: many times, the mangaka is not the only person behind the decisions that end up on the printed page.
Post a Comment