The ending of Attack on Titan is quite divisive and has suffered a lot of criticism from fans
A good while has passed since the ending of Attack on Titan was revealed, considered one of the best Shonen anime of all time and one of the most beloved as well. However, despite the fact that the story created by Hajime Isayama transcended and surpassed all kinds of barrierscould not escape a much criticized conclusion.
And, although the entire story was impressive and spectacular, it cannot be denied that the conclusion was quite controversial, causing division among the fan community. Besides, Some think that those who criticize the ending do so without basisbut the truth is that there are several reasons why it is a closing that not everyone liked. Next, we will review some of these.
Many criticized the fact that Eren became the villain
The journey of character destruction that Eren suffered when he became the villain
Eren Jeager will be remembered as one of the most interesting and complex protagonists. And the fact is that, who began as a young dreamer, with hopes of restoring peace in his home and putting an end to the Titans, he ended up becoming a genocidal villain.
It turned out to be a big change of focus when everyone was seeing an ending where everyone was against Eren, instead of the opposite as expected. Obviously, this is not necessarily a bad thing, because the criticism is made in all the destruction of character that Eren suffered by being separated from those characteristics that fans loved about him. And just like that, Eren went from being humanity’s hope to a mass murderer.
The abrupt change in the plot was not very well received by everyone
Another detail that suffered great criticism from fans It was the change of focus that the plot had. And, at first, the work was about a war against the Titans and political issues.
Going from an approach where the mission was to destroy those monsters to one where you had to face other humans outside the walls was shocking. Not to mention that, after some point in history, everything felt like it was more about love than other more complex issues.
Everything that made Attack on Titan different, such as the uncertainty and changing morality of its characters, disappeared towards the end where all matters were simpler. Obviously, this was always a work that left us with brutal moments.
Ymir’s lack of will
The fact that Ymir has not been built on her power, but has always been a submissive and willless slave
Ymir is the perfect one representation of Stockholm Syndromewhich is a case of people falling in love with their oppressors and suppressing their will. And this is something that fans did not like.
And after gaining her Titan powers, Ymir did not change nor did it develop its history based on this powerbut rather suppressed her will and remained a slave abused and manipulated by her king. Until the last day of her life she remained submissive and obedient.
The series tried to justify this whole thing with love and freedom, but it was something that fans didn’t like very much. In the end, He had all the power in the world and never stopped being a submissive victim.creating that chain of love and lack of freedom that continued until Eren and Mikasa.
The justification for genocide
The author’s intention It was nothing other than showing the reality of an infinite cycle of war and death. Therefore, he directed the story in a way that viewers and readers had to choose a side. However, criticism arises when looking at Eren’s resolution to this problem.
And fans often criticize the fact that Eren, with all the power in the world, has not been able to find another solution to this infinite cycle of hatefear and war, but without having to murder more than 80% of the population, including innocents. Ultimately, he was able to come up with another plan, ask Armin for help, or some other less extreme action.
